Workout Planning

Workout Split Recommender

Find the best training split for your schedule, experience level, and goal. Get evidence-based recommendations with a full weekly workout schedule template highlighting which muscle groups to train each day.

Find Your Optimal Split

Evidence-based recommendation

Evidence-based training frequency research (Schoenfeld, 2016; Ralston, 2017) consistently shows that training each muscle group at least twice per week produces greater hypertrophic adaptations than once per week training at the same total weekly volume. The split recommendations below are built around this principle of optimal frequency.

Training Split Comparison Chart

SplitDaysFreq/MuscleBest ForExperience
Full Body2–32–3×/weekBeginners, fat loss, time-limitedBeginner
Upper / Lower42×/weekHypertrophy, balanced developmentIntermediate
PPL (Push/Pull/Legs)5–61–2×/weekHypertrophy, intermediate-advancedIntermediate+
Bro Split (Body Part)51×/weekAdvanced high volumeAdvanced
nSuns / Strength5–62–3×/week main liftsPowerlifting, strength focusIntermediate+
PHUL (Power Hypertrophy)42×/weekStrength + hypertrophy comboIntermediate

The Science Behind Workout Split Optimisation

The most important variable determining the effectiveness of any workout split is weekly training volume per muscle group — defined as total sets per week. Research by Schoenfeld, Krieger, and Ogborn (2017) established that 10–20 sets per muscle group per week optimises hypertrophy for most intermediate lifters, with diminishing returns above that range. The second key variable is training frequency. A 2018 meta-analysis published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research found that training each muscle group twice per week resulted in significantly greater muscle protein synthesis and hypertrophy compared to once per week, when total weekly sets were equated. This makes Upper/Lower and PPL splits — both of which achieve ≥2×/week frequency — superior to traditional Bro Splits for the majority of natural lifters not yet advanced enough to recover from high-volume single-day sessions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Best splits by days: 2–3 days → Full Body. 3–4 days → Upper/Lower. 4–5 days → Push/Pull/Legs. 5–6 days → PPL×2. Each muscle group should be trained ≥2×/week for optimal hypertrophy (Schoenfeld, 2016). Full Body and Upper/Lower achieve this most reliably. PPL run 3 days/week trains each muscle 1×/week — suboptimal compared to 3× full body. PPL run 6 days achieves 2×/week optimally.
For 4 training days: Upper/Lower has a slight edge — consistent 2×/week frequency, manageable per-session volume, better for beginners to intermediate lifters. For 6 training days: PPL×2 is excellent — high volume with adequate recovery. PPL run 3 days achieves only 1×/week frequency — suboptimal for hypertrophy. The right answer depends entirely on how many days you can commit — an Upper/Lower you can sustain for 12 months beats a 6-day PPL you abandon after 6 weeks.
Full body 3×/week is the clear winner for beginners. Reason: beginner gains are primarily neurological (learning to recruit muscle fibres), not muscular. More frequent practice of movement patterns (squatting 3×/week vs 1×/week) accelerates skill acquisition and neurological adaptation faster. Proven beginner programmes (StrongLifts 5×5, Starting Strength, GZCLP) use full-body training. Switch to Upper/Lower or PPL after 6–12 months when beginner gains plateau.
3–5 days/week is optimal for most natural athletes. 2 days: maintenance-level for most people. 3 days: full body — highly effective, sustainable. 4 days: Upper/Lower — ideal frequency/volume balance. 5 days: PPL + arms — high volume, works for intermediate. 6 days: PPL×2 — only effective for advanced athletes who recover well. More sessions only improve results if recovery quality is sufficient (sleep, nutrition). Overtraining is less common than suspected but under-recovering is extremely common.